Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39803846›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2025

Global prevalence and risk factors of obstetric violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sevil Hakimi, Leila Allahqoli, Maryam Alizadeh, Meryem Ozdemir, Hamid Soori, Esin Ceber Turfan, Neriman Sogukpinar, Ibrahim Alkatout

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Global prevalence and risk factors of obstetric violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. FIGO statement on respectful care: Addressing disrespectful maternity care.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sevil HakimiFaculty of Health Sciences, EGE University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3164-4867
Leila AllahqoliMinistry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9851-6771
Maryam AlizadehTabriz University of Medical Science, Myianeh Branch, Myianeh, Iran.
Meryem OzdemirÇiğli Educational and Training Hospital, University of Bakirçay, Izmir, Turkey.
Hamid SooriFaculty of Medicine, Cyprus International University, Nicosia, Northern Cyprus.
Esin Ceber TurfanFaculty of Health Sciences, EGE University, Izmir, Turkey.
Neriman SogukpinarFaculty of Health Sciences, EGE University, Izmir, Turkey.
Ibrahim AlkatoutDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kiel School of Gynaecology Endoscopy, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObstetric violence (OBV), defined as mistreatment or abuse during childbirth, is a pervasive global issue, albeit with regional differences, affecting women's physical and emotional well-being.

objectivesThe purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the prevalence of OBV to identify risk factors associated with OBV and to make suggestions for improving maternal healthcare practices and policies. SEARCH STRATEGY: In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched four electronic databases for studies published over 10 years up to 31 January 2024: Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science (WOS). The search was conducted among English language papers using a carefully curated set of keywords. SELECTION CRITERIA: We conducted a comprehensive review, including all observational reporting data on the prevalence of and risk factors associated with OBV, irrespective of geographical location. The studies included in the review were required to be published in peer-reviewed. journals and available in the English language. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The data of the studies were summarized in an Excel file (version 19) and analyzed using R (version 4.2.3). A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the pooled prevalence of and identify risk factors associated with OBV. MAIN

resultsThe global prevalence of OBV estimated based on 25 studies, calculated with a random-effects model, was 59% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.70; I

conclusionThis systematic review and meta-analysis highlights the considerable prevalence and multifaceted nature of OBV, underscoring the urgent need for interventions at multiple levels to address this pervasive issue and ensure respectful, safe, and dignified maternal healthcare for all women.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricFemaleGlobal HealthHumansPregnancyPrevalenceRisk Factorschildbirthnon‐consented careobstetric violencerespectful maternal carevaginal delivery

Identifiers

PMID39803846
PMCPMC12093919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.