ReviewAmerican journal of cancer research2024
Advancing precision and personalized breast cancer treatment through multi-omics technologies.
Review in American journal of cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Breast Cancer Research: Immunological, Pathological, and Pharmacological Perspectives for Improving Patient Outcomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Time-Dependent Loss of miR-548c-3p and Activation of E2F3/FOXM1 in Breast Cancer: In Vitro and TCGA-Based Evidence for a Post-Transcriptional Mechanism.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- The Role of Androgen Receptor and Antiandrogen Therapy in Breast Cancer: A Scoping Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Breast Cancer: Challenges in the Treatment and Prodrug Strategies.Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Real-world evidence on data quality in precision oncology platforms: insights from the Molecular Twin Research Umbrella protocol.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Integrating in silico modeling and experimental validation to determine the anti-breast cancer mechanisms of mulberry leaf bioactive compounds.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Liquid Biopsy and Multi-Omic Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: Innovations in Early Detection, Therapy Guidance, and Disease Monitoring.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Application and Progress of Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) in the Treatment of Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Oncology and therapy · 2025Review
- Solid tumor rejection using personalized incompatible human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and blood group ABH antigens.Exploration of medicine · 2025Article
- Antibody-drug conjugates in cancer therapy: current landscape, challenges, and future directions.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Deciphering and targeting oncogenic pathways through integrated approaches and amino acid metabolism in hematologic malignancies.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- The dark matter in cancer immunology: beyond the visible- unveiling multiomics pathways to breakthrough therapies.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- The impact of liquid biopsy in breast cancer: Redefining the landscape of non-invasive precision oncology.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
- Early and hereditary breast cancer: advances in risk stratification and imaging approaches.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumour in women, with more than 685,000 women dying of breast cancer each year. The heterogeneity of breast cancer complicates both treatment and diagnosis. Traditional methods based on histopathology and hormone receptor status are now no longer sufficient. Recently, advances in multi-omics techniques, including genomic, proteomic, and transcriptomic analyses, have deepened our understanding of breast cancer. Combining these approaches allows for precise molecular subtyping, which is essential for the detection of key mutations, protein interactions and gene expression patterns that are highly relevant to different therapeutic strategies. Genomic analyses have been effectively identifying key mutations in cancer. Meanwhile, proteomics and transcriptomics complement by identifying new therapeutic targets and elucidating gene expression dynamics. Integrating multi-omics and conventional diagnostics improves tumour characterisation and enables prognostic accuracy comparable to established standards and treatment response. Existing and emerging technologies enable real-time enhanced tumour follow-up and data analysis through liquid biopsy and artificial intelligence, respectively. Despite these clinical implementation challenges, multi-omics including clinical phenotyping offers significant potential for precision breast cancer treatment. This article describes recent advances in molecular subtyping and multi-omics technologies that are driving key innovations to optimise patient outcomes and further develop personalised medicine in the context of breast cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.