ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2024
Predictive value of peripheral blood indicators plus procalcitonin clearance rate for mortality in cancer patients with sepsis.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive Value of the Neutrophil‒Lymphocyte Ratio in the Risk Stratification and Prognosis for Patients with Acute Cholangitis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- In-hospital survival characteristics and predictive model for patients with malignant tumors and sepsis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The J-shaped association between the ratio of neutrophil counts to prognostic nutritional index and mortality in ICU patients with sepsis: a retrospective study based on the MIMIC database.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Prognostic utility of procalcitonin and lactate clearance for in-hospital mortality in sepsis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the predictive value of combining peripheral blood indicators with procalcitonin clearance rate (PCTc) to assess mortality risk in cancer patients with sepsis, aiming to develop a more sensitive and specific clinical tool. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 393 cancer patients with sepsis admitted to South China Hospital of Shenzhen University from January 2019 to January 2024. Collected data included clinical demographics, laboratory indicators such as white blood cell count, neutrophil count (NEUT), platelet count (PLT), lymphocyte count (LYC), C-reactive protein, procalcitonin (PCT), alanine aminotransferase, and the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to inspired oxygen fraction, as well as functional scores like Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment. Multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves assessed the predictive ability of these factors for 28-day survival. Results showed significantly higher NEUT (P<0.001) and lower PLT and LYC (P<0.001) in the death group, while APACHE II score (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.776) and PCT 24h (AUC = 0.723) demonstrated strong predictive value for mortality risk. The joint projection model's AUC reached 0.966, significantly outperforming individual indicators, indicating that combining multiple indicators offers a more accurate prediction of survival versus mortality risk. Additionally, 24h LCR and 24h PCTc were notably lower in the death group compared to the survival group, reinforcing the advantage of combined indicators for prognosis. Overall, using both peripheral blood indicators and PCTc significantly improves the accuracy of mortality risk assessment in cancer patients with sepsis, enhancing prognostic evaluation and supporting optimized clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.