ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2024
XGBoost-based nomogram for predicting lymph node metastasis in endometrial carcinoma.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a risk prediction model for rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease based on interpretable machine learning.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Development of an interpretable machine learning model for lymphovascular space invasion prediction in patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma: A prospective study.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026Article
- Early-stage diagnosis of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders via multiple learning models based on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to construct and optimize risk prediction models for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in endometrial carcinoma (EC) patients, thus improving the identification of patients at high risk of LNM and further providing accurate support for clinical decision-making. This retrospective analysis included 541 cases of EC treated at The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University between January 2017 and January 2022. Various clinical and pathological variables were incorporated, including age, body mass index (BMI), pathological grading, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) levels, and tumor size. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for LNM. Subsequently, the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), RandomForest, and Support Vector Machine (SVM), all machine-learning algorithms, were adopted to select features and build models. The XGBoost model gave the best performance among all models, with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.876 and 0.832 for training and validation sets, respectively, suggesting its high discriminatory ability and prediction accuracy. Moreover, the calibration curve analysis further verified the consistency of the model-predicted values with the actual results, indicating the model's good applicability at various risk levels. According to the decision curve analysis, the XGBoost model showed high net benefits within most risk-threshold ranges, indicating its substantial practical value in clinical applications. Conclusively, this study successfully builds machine-learning models based on multiple clinical and pathological features, which can effectively predict the LNM risk in EC patients. The model is expected to provide important references for clinicians in surgical decision-making and the formulation of individualized treatment plans, thereby enhancing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.