ArticleHeart rhythm O22024
A deep learning modular ECG approach for cardiologist assisted adjudication of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter episodes.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- R-R Interval Histogram-Based Deep Learning for 3-Class Atrial Fibrillation Screening in Garment-Type Wearable Holter Electrocardiogram Monitoring: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Clinical performance of an atrial fibrillation burden tracking algorithm: Evaluation against reference public and clinical textile electrocardiographic datasets.Heart rhythm O2 · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Detection of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATA) on long-term electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings is a prerequisite to reduce ATA-related adverse events. However, the burden of editing massive ECG data is not sustainable. Deep learning (DL) algorithms provide improved performances on resting ECG databases. However, results on long-term Holter recordings are scarce. Objective: We aimed to build and evaluate a DL modular software using ECG features well known to cardiologists with a user interface that allows cardiologists to adjudicate the results and drive a second DL analysis. Methods: Using a large (n = 187 recordings, 249,419 one-minute samples), beat-to-beat annotated, two-lead Holter database, we built a DL algorithm with a modular structure mimicking expert physician ECG interpretation to classify atrial rhythms. The DL network includes 3 modules (cardiac rhythm regularity, electrical atrial waveform, and raw voltage by time data) followed by a decision network and a long-term weighting factor. The algorithm was validated on an external database. Results: F1 scores of our classifier were 99% for ATA detection, 95% for atrial fibrillation, and 90% for atrial flutter. Using the external Massachusetts Institute of Technology database, the classifier obtains an F1-score of 97% for the normal sinus rhythm class and 96% for the ATA class. Residual errors could be corrected by manual deactivation of 1 module in 7 of 15 of the recordings, with an accuracy < 90%. Conclusion: A DL modular software using ECG features well known to cardiologists provided an excellent overall performance. Clinically significant residual errors were most often related to the classification of the atrial arrhythmia type (fibrillation vs flutter). The modular structure of the algorithm helped to edit and correct the artificial intelligence-based first-pass analysis and will provide a basis for explainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.