ArticleHeart rhythm O22024
A proposed algorithm for management of patients with left bundle branch block post-TAVR: 1-year follow-up.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has revolutionized the management of aortic stenosis and has become the standard of care across a broad spectrum of patients with aortic stenosis. However, it is still associated with high incidence of conduction abnormalities, particularly new left bundle branch block (LBBB). Management of these patients remains a challenge. Objective: The study sought to assess the clinical outcomes of patients with post-TAVR conduction disorders managed according to a prespecified institutionally developed algorithm. Methods: A retrospective analysis including all patients undergoing TAVR in our institute between October 2018 and December 2022 was performed. Patients with new LBBB were managed according to the algorithm comprising QRS width and electrophysiology study. In-hospital and 1-year clinical outcomes were assessed. Results: A total of 230 patients were included in the present analysis. Seventy (30.4%) patients developed new LBBB after TAVR. Overall, 44 (19.1%) patients required permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation: 20 (8.7%) patients with Mobitz II, complete atrioventricular block, or alternating bundle branch block; 21 (9.1%) patients with persistent new LBBB; and 3 (1.3%) patients per physician discretion. During 1-year follow-up, only 3 patients required late PPM implantation, of whom there was only 1 patient with new LBBB. There was no difference in mortality or heart failure hospitalizations between the per PPM and no PPM groups. Multivariable analysis identified atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, and pre-TAVR right bundle branch block as independent predictors for PPM implantation following TAVR. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the presented algorithm may serve as a safe and efficacious strategy for management of patient with post-TAVR LBBB, although the PPM implantation rate may be further reduced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.