ArticleHeart rhythm O22024
Ventricular tachycardia ablation across age groups: Outcomes, trends and demographics. Insights from the National Inpatient Sample Database.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Outcomes in Patients Without Previous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Insertion: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ventricular tachycardia ablation (VTA) is an important treatment option for ventricular tachycardia, with increasing use across all age groups. However, age-related differences in outcomes remain a concern. Objective: This study aimed to investigate age-related trends in VTA procedures and their associated adverse events across the United States from 2011 to 2021. The primary objective was to analyze VTA outcomes across different age groups. Secondary objectives included examining variation in VTA rate by sex and geographic region. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample, focusing on adult patients (≥18 years of age) hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia. Patients were divided into 3 age groups: ≤59, 60 to 79, and ≥80 years. We evaluated VTA frequency, in-hospital mortality, and complications using propensity score matching to control for confounders. Secondary analyses examined sex and geographic differences. Results: The study included 95,913 VTA procedures. The mean age of patients undergoing VTA increased over time, with a growing proportion of procedures performed in older patients. While overall adverse events did not significantly differ across age groups, specific outcomes such as mortality and hemorrhage were significantly higher in patients ≥80 years of age. In-hospital mortality was highest in the ≥80 years age group (5.1%), compared with 1.6% in the ≤59 years age group and 2.7% in the 60 to 79 years age group. Significant differences by sex and region were also observed. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that while the overall incidence of adverse events with VTA did not significantly increase with age, specific severe outcomes, such as in-hospital mortality and hemorrhage, were more prevalent in older patients. These findings suggest that VTA can be safely performed across age groups, but careful consideration is essential for elderly patients. Future research should focus on understanding the impact of age-related physiological changes and comorbidities on VTA outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.