ArticleJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus2024
P-, E-, and H-cadherins differ in their relationships with coronary stenosis, cardiovascular outcomes, and unplanned recurrent revascularization.
Article in Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Femoral artery plaque: A simple ultrasound clue for severe coronary stenosis.World journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Circulating levels of cadherins are associated with atherosclerosis and cardiovascular outcomes.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology plus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Cadherins are adhesion proteins, and their dysregulation may result in the development of atherosclerosis, plaque rupture, or lesions of the vascular wall. The aim of the present study was to detect the associations of cadherins-P, -E, and -H, with atherosclerosis and pathological cardiovascular conditions. Methods and results: The present study with 3-year follow up evaluated atherosclerosis and fasting levels of P-, E-, and H-cadherins in the serum samples of 214 patients in a hospital setting. Coronary lesions were assessed by coronary angiography as Gensini score. Serum proteomic profiling was performed using antibody microarrays. The contents of P-, E-, and H-cadherins in the serum were measured using indirect ELISA. High levels of P- and E-cadherins and low levels of H-cadherin were associated with severity of atherosclerosis. High levels of P- and E-cadherins were associated with higher incidence of nonfatal cardiovascular outcomes. E-cadherin was associated with higher incidence of recurrent revascularization during 3 year follow-up. The results of Spearman rank correlation analysis revealed various associations of the three cadherins with lipid, endothelial, and metabolic biomarkers. Conclusions: The data indicated that classical and atypical cadherins were associated with atherosclerosis progression. Elevated levels of P-cadherin were associated with coronary atherosclerosis. The data indicated that various lipid, endothelial, and metabolic biomarkers may influence the levels of cadherins. Thus, P-, E-, and H-cadherins may be promising markers for the assessment of cardiovascular risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.