ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Evaluation of subretinally delivered Cas9 ribonucleoproteins in murine and porcine animal models highlights key considerations for therapeutic translation of genetic medicines.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Regulation of cGAS-STING signalling and its diversity of cellular outcomes.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic medicines, including CRISPR/Cas technologies, extend tremendous promise for addressing unmet medical need in inherited retinal disorders and other indications; however, there remain challenges for the development of therapeutics. Herein, we evaluate genome editing by engineered Cas9 ribonucleoproteins (eRNP) in vivo via subretinal administration using mouse and pig animal models. Subretinal administration of adenine base editor and double strand break-inducing Cas9 nuclease eRNPs mediate genome editing in both species. Editing occurs in retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) and photoreceptor cells, with favorable tolerability in both species. Using transgenic reporter strains, we determine that editing primarily occurs close to the site of administration, within the bleb region associated with subretinal injection. Our results show that subretinal administration of eRNPs in mice mediates base editing of up to 12% of the total neural retina, with an average rate of 7% observed at the highest dose tested. In contrast, a substantially lower editing efficiency was observed in minipigs; even with direct quantification of only the treated region, a maximum base editing rate of 1.5%, with an average rate of <1%, was observed. Our data highlight the importance of species consideration in translational studies for genetic medicines targeting the eye and provide an example of a lack of translation between small and larger animal models in the context of subretinal administration of Cas9 eRNPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.