Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Zachary ZeidlerDepartment of Physiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6539-4360
Marta Fernandez GomezDepartment of Psychiatry, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095, United States.
Tanya A GuptaDepartment of Psychiatry, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095, United States.
Meelan ShariDepartment of Physiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095, United States.
Scott A WilkeDepartment of Psychiatry, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095, United States.
Laura A DeNardoDepartment of Physiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, 90095, United States.
Funding
Prefrontal circuits underlying the maturation of learned avoidanceR01MH127214 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Laura Anne DeNardo · 2022 to 2026
$2.3M
Role of prefrontal dopamine circuits in threat avoidance learningR01MH137461 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Laura Anne DeNardo, Scott Allen Wilke · 2024 to 2026
$2.2M
Role of prefrontostriatal circuits in effort-based, cost-benefit decision makingR01MH131858 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Scott Allen Wilke · 2023 to 2026
$2.1M
Training in Neurotechnology TranslationT32NS115753 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LU, DANIEL, MARKOVIC, DEJAN · 2020 to 2024
$1.2M
Reorganization of cortical memory ensembles across timeF32MH133387 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ZEIDLER, ZACHARY E · 2023 to 2025
To survive, animals must rapidly learn to avoid predictable threats. Such learning depends on detecting reliable cue-outcome relationships that efficiently drive behavioral adaptations. The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) integrates learned information about the environment to guide adaptive behaviors
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Dopaminergic projections to the prefrontal cortex are critical for rapid threat avoidance learning. · full record | OpenQuestion