ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Responses to conflicting binocular stimuli in mouse primary visual cortex.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Binocular vision requires that the brain integrate input from both eyes to form a unified percept. Small interocular differences support depth perception (stereopsis), while larger disparities can cause diplopia or binocular rivalry. The neural mechanisms by which early visual circuits process concordant versus conflicting binocular signals remain incompletely understood, particularly in the case of large disparities. Here, we used visually evoked potential (VEP) recordings, unit recordings, and 2-photon calcium imaging in the binocular region of mouse primary visual cortex (bV1) to examine how distinct forms of binocular disparity engage local circuits. Using a dichoptic display, we found that interocular phase disparities reduced VEP magnitude through decreased neuronal firing early in the response (40-80 ms after stimulus onset). In contrast, orientation disparities also decreased VEP magnitude, but via increased firing later in the response (100-200 ms). This late activity was enhanced in both regular-spiking (putative excitatory) and fast-spiking (putative parvalbumin-positive inhibitory) units. In contrast, calcium imaging revealed that somatostatin-positive interneurons were suppressed during orientation conflict. These findings suggest that phase differences suppress bV1 responses via feedforward mechanisms, while orientation disparities prolong activity through disinhibition mediated by somatostatin-positive interneurons. Our results identify distinct circuit pathways recruited by different forms of binocular conflict, clarify how early visual cortex contributes to binocular integration, and provide a foundation for investigating perceptual suppression and rivalry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.