Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39803450›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Responses to conflicting binocular stimuli in mouse primary visual cortex.

Daniel P Montgomery, Daniel A Bowen, Jin Wu, Mark F Bear, Eric D Gaier

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel P MontgomeryCenter for Neuroscience Research, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC.
Daniel A BowenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Jin WuBrandeis Neuroscience Graduate Program, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.
Mark F BearPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-9903-2541
Eric D GaierDepartment of Ophthalmology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-2923-0024

Funding

Behavioral Consequences and cellular substrates of plasticity in visual cortexR01EY023037 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BEAR, MARK F · 2013 to 2025
$6.0M
Exploiting principles of timing-dependent synaptic plasticity to treat amblyopiaK08EY030164 · NEI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI GAIER, ERIC DEAN · 2019 to 2023
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS K08 EY030164NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binocular vision requires that the brain integrate input from both eyes to form a unified percept. Small interocular differences support depth perception (stereopsis), while larger disparities can cause diplopia or binocular rivalry. The neural mechanisms by which early visual circuits process concordant versus conflicting binocular signals remain incompletely understood, particularly in the case of large disparities. Here, we used visually evoked potential (VEP) recordings, unit recordings, and 2-photon calcium imaging in the binocular region of mouse primary visual cortex (bV1) to examine how distinct forms of binocular disparity engage local circuits. Using a dichoptic display, we found that interocular phase disparities reduced VEP magnitude through decreased neuronal firing early in the response (40-80 ms after stimulus onset). In contrast, orientation disparities also decreased VEP magnitude, but via increased firing later in the response (100-200 ms). This late activity was enhanced in both regular-spiking (putative excitatory) and fast-spiking (putative parvalbumin-positive inhibitory) units. In contrast, calcium imaging revealed that somatostatin-positive interneurons were suppressed during orientation conflict. These findings suggest that phase differences suppress bV1 responses via feedforward mechanisms, while orientation disparities prolong activity through disinhibition mediated by somatostatin-positive interneurons. Our results identify distinct circuit pathways recruited by different forms of binocular conflict, clarify how early visual cortex contributes to binocular integration, and provide a foundation for investigating perceptual suppression and rivalry.

Indexed as

binocular rivalryBinocular visioninterocular suppression

Identifiers

PMID39803450
PMCPMC11722220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.