Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39803413›Full record

ArticleEpilepsy & behavior reports2025

Practical Considerations for the rapid titration of VNS.

Riëm El Tahry, Maxine Dibué, Arnaud Szmalec, Roshani Patel, Ryan Verner, Massimiliano Boffini, Firas Fahoum, Michal Tzadok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsy & behavior reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Vagus nerve stimulation and fast parameter programming protocol in children with febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome in ICU.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Riëm El TahryInstitute of Neuroscience, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium.
Maxine DibuéMedical Affairs Neuromodulation, LivaNova PLC, London, United Kingdom.
Arnaud SzmalecCenter for Refractory Epilepsy, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Roshani PatelMedical Affairs Neuromodulation, LivaNova PLC, London, United Kingdom.
Ryan VernerMedical Affairs Neuromodulation, LivaNova PLC, London, United Kingdom.
Massimiliano BoffiniMedical Affairs Neuromodulation, LivaNova PLC, London, United Kingdom.
Firas FahoumNeurological Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Michal TzadokFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who are not candidates for epilepsy surgery, Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is the most widely available neuromodulation option and has been available in several countries for 30 years. Given its broad availability and extended history on the market, many healthcare providers (HCPs) have developed individualized practice habits regarding the titration and dosing of VNS. This study provides novel evidence to describe the extent to which VNS management differs among providers and discusses recent literature that indicates how unique programming approaches may impact patient outcomes. In this work, practice habits regarding the titration and dosing of VNS were explored through a survey of HCPs and an examination of ongoing study data collected as part of the CORE-VNS Study. The global survey revealed significant variability in dosing and titration habits. Providers reported a wide range of initial/maximum target doses and time-to-dose, even if the population averages approximated guidance from professional societies and the manufacturer's labeling. Variable dosing and titration were reflected in varied perception of how long it takes to realize the clinical benefits of VNS. In the CORE-VNS Study, this reported experience was represented in how different generator models were used, with users of SenTiva (and the Scheduled Programming feature) depicting faster time-to-dose than those using earlier models of VNS. Our results suggest VNS providers would benefit from continued training on the use of VNS and the use of the scheduled programming feature to enhance consistency of VNS management among providers.

Indexed as

DosingPractice SurveyTitrationVagus Nerve StimulationVNS

Identifiers

PMID39803413
PMCPMC11721848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.