Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39803399›Full record

ArticleTaiwan journal of ophthalmology

An atypical case of retinal pigment epithelium tear with remodeling and visual preservation.

Charles Jit Teng Ong, Chui Ming Gemmy Cheung

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Charles Jit Teng OngSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Chui Ming Gemmy CheungSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report describes a patient with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) with fovea-involving retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) tear that showed tissue remodeling with a good visual outcome. Imaging over the patient's clinical course from 2019 was reviewed. A 74-year-old female presented with left submacular hemorrhage and a large multi-lobular pigment epithelial detachment. Left eye vision was 6/19 at the presentation. Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) revealed underlying PCV. One month after initiation of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA, Bayer), she developed fresh subretinal hemorrhage. An RPE tear of 1 disc area in size, centered over the fovea was diagnosed. The torn RPE edge was scrolled up temporal to the fovea on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), with hypertransmission into the choroid observed over the area of RPE loss. Left eye vision after the RPE tear was 6/15. Over the next 2 months, the subretinal hemorrhage resolved following further IVA. At month 3, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) demonstrated hypo-autofluorescence while fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and ICGA showed a window defect corresponding to the area of RPE tear. On SD-OCT, there was a faint hyper-reflective layer where one might expect the RPE layer to be. Serial SD-OCT scans over 5 years revealed increasing prominence of the hyperreflective layer between the ellipsoid zone and Bruch's membrane. FAF remained hypo-autofluorescent. At the last review, the patient retained 6/9 vision. We report a case of fovea-involving RPE tear documented with multimodal imaging with good visual outcome, which is atypical. Serial OCT suggests tissue remodeling may explain the functional preservation.

Indexed as

age-related macular degenerationmultimodal imagingPolypoidal choroidal vasculopathyretinal pigment epitheliumretinal pigment epithelium teartissue remodeling

Identifiers

PMID39803399
PMCPMC11717326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.