ArticleThe journal of advanced prosthodontics2024
Evaluating the microgap and sealing capability in four implant systems with different interlockings under different tightening torques: an
Article in The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study assessed the microgap width and adhesion of three bacterial species in four dental implants with different interlocks under four screwing torques. MATERIALS AND
methodsTen samples of four implant systems with various interlockings, including full-hexagonal (FHI), cylindrical-conical trilobe-index (TLI), Morse-taper with octagon terminal index (OI), and hexagonal interlock (slip-fit) (HI-SF), were used. The abutments were screwed to the fixtures under torques of 10, 20, 30, and 40 Ncm. The microgap between the abutment and the platform was assessed using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). The leakage of 3 bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, was evaluated under 30 Ncm torque.
resultsThe TLI system showed the widest gap under all torques compared to others. There was no significance among all systems under different screwing torques. Regarding the leakage, there was no adherence to
conclusionEven with low torque, the studied systems showed gap widths narrower than acceptable width. Implant systems with FHI and OI demonstrated misfits of less than 2 µm upon 10 Ncm and less than 1 µm when the torque increases, giving them priority to be used in areas with poor bone quality. The HI-SF demonstrated a high ability to resist the adherence to
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.