Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39803381›Full record

ArticleThe journal of advanced prosthodontics2024

A study to evaluate the influence of non-axial forces on tooth - a split mouth cross-sectional study.

Disha Oberoi, Chethan Hegde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Disha OberoiDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, NITTE Deemed to be University, Mangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8358-3531
Chethan HegdeDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, AB Shetty Memorial Institute of Dental Sciences, NITTE Deemed to be University, Mangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3751-7789

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProper tooth alignment directs occlusal forces along the long axis, supporting optimal masticatory function and periodontal health. Deviations that lead to non-axial forces are common; however, teeth with such deviations often maintain optimal health. This study aims to assess various occlusal and periodontal parameters in teeth experiencing non-axial forces to better understand the underlying reasons and mechanisms that contribute to their maintained health status. MATERIALS AND

methodsFifty subjects, each with one normally aligned posterior tooth (Group A) and a malaligned contralateral tooth (Group B), were recruited for this study. Clinical assessments were conducted to measure relative occlusal load, gingival status, and alveolar bone levels in both groups. Statistical analyses were performed to compare findings between normally aligned and malaligned teeth.

resultsSeventy two percent of malaligned teeth (9.33 ± 6.38%) exhibited reduced relative occlusal force compared to normally aligned teeth (12.05 ± 8.39%). No significant differences in gingival status or alveolar bone levels were observed between the two groups.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that malaligned teeth can adapt to non-axial occlusal forces while preserving their structural integrity, which could imply the presence of adaptive mechanisms within the stomatognathic system. Further research is needed to differentiate the types and directions of occlusal forces and to explore the broader clinical implications of these findings across diverse populations.

Indexed as

Dental occlusionGingivaOcclusal forcesPeriodontiumStomatognathic system

Identifiers

PMID39803381
PMCPMC11711452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.