Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39803374›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in toxicology2025

Fit for purpose testing and independent GMP validation of the monocyte activation test.

Ruth Daniels, Wim Van der Elst, Chi K So, Liesbeth Voeten, Philip Breugelmans, Marijke W A Molenaar-de Backer, Stephen Poole, Mehul Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ruth DanielsAnalytical Development Microbiology CoE, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (a Johnson and Johnson Company), Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340 Beerse, Belgium.
Wim Van der ElstStatistics and Decision Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (a Johnson and Johnson Company), Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340 Beerse, Belgium.
Chi K SoLarge Molecule Analytical Development, Janssen Biologics LLC (a Johnson and Johnson Company), 200 Great Valley Parkway, Malvern, PA 19355 USA.
Liesbeth VoetenAnalytical Development Microbiology CoE, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (a Johnson and Johnson Company), Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340 Beerse, Belgium.
Philip BreugelmansAnalytical Development Microbiology CoE, Janssen Pharmaceutica NV (a Johnson and Johnson Company), Turnhoutseweg 30, 2340 Beerse, Belgium.
Marijke W A Molenaar-de BackerVirology and MAT Services, Sanquin Diagnostic Services, Plesmanlaan 125, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Stephen PooleConsultant to Johnson & Johnson, Merton Park, London SW19, UK.
Mehul PatelLarge Molecule Analytical Development, Janssen Biologics LLC (a Johnson and Johnson Company), 200 Great Valley Parkway, Malvern, PA 19355 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study describes the "fit for purpose" testing and the independent product-specific GMP validation of the monocyte activation test (MAT) to detect pyrogenic and pro-inflammatory contaminants, MAT Method A, Quantitative Test (European Pharmacopoeia, Ph. Eur. chapter 2.6.30, 2017). A fit for purpose study was carried out to ensure that the chosen MAT set-up (cryopreserved PBMC, IL-6 detection) can reliably discriminate between batches of product containing pyrogenic contaminants below the contaminants limit concentration, CLC, from batches containing pyrogenic contaminants above the CLC. Such testing is carried out once, before the chosen MAT set-up is used for subsequent product testing to show that the incidence of false positives (pyrogen-negative (<CLC) batches testing as pyrogen-positive (>CLC) batches) and - especially - false negatives (pyrogen-positive (>CLC) testing as pyrogen-negative (<CLC)) is low. This study also afforded the opportunity to collect an independent body of validation data for comparison with that obtained previously (Daniels et al., 2022) to evaluate the robustness of MAT Method A and its fitness to replace the rabbit pyrogen test (RPT) where this has not already happened.

Indexed as

Cryo-preserved PBMCFit for purpose testingGMP validationMATRPTUnited States Pharmacopoeia (USP)Validation the non-compendial method

Identifiers

PMID39803374
PMCPMC11721511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.