ArticleCurrent research in toxicology2025
Fit for purpose testing and independent GMP validation of the monocyte activation test.
Article in Current research in toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Applicability of Whole Blood Monocyte Activation Test for Endotoxin Activity Assessment in Hydroxyapatite-Based Ceramics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study describes the "fit for purpose" testing and the independent product-specific GMP validation of the monocyte activation test (MAT) to detect pyrogenic and pro-inflammatory contaminants, MAT Method A, Quantitative Test (European Pharmacopoeia, Ph. Eur. chapter 2.6.30, 2017). A fit for purpose study was carried out to ensure that the chosen MAT set-up (cryopreserved PBMC, IL-6 detection) can reliably discriminate between batches of product containing pyrogenic contaminants below the contaminants limit concentration, CLC, from batches containing pyrogenic contaminants above the CLC. Such testing is carried out once, before the chosen MAT set-up is used for subsequent product testing to show that the incidence of false positives (pyrogen-negative (<CLC) batches testing as pyrogen-positive (>CLC) batches) and - especially - false negatives (pyrogen-positive (>CLC) testing as pyrogen-negative (<CLC)) is low. This study also afforded the opportunity to collect an independent body of validation data for comparison with that obtained previously (Daniels et al., 2022) to evaluate the robustness of MAT Method A and its fitness to replace the rabbit pyrogen test (RPT) where this has not already happened.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.