Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39803346›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of neurotrauma2024

Decompressive Craniectomy and Hinged Craniotomy for Traumatic Brain Injury: Experience in Two Centers in a Middle-Income Country.

Carlos A Gamboa-Oñate, Nicolás Rincón-Arias, Matías Baldoncini, Ivo Kehayov, Yovany A Capacho-Delgado, María L Monsalve, Paula Robayo, Paula Pulido, Ivanna Solano-Cuellar, Laura Ramírez and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of neurotrauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Hinge craniotomy in pediatric traumatic brain injury: a narrative review and national survey among Mexican neurosurgeons.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Carlos A Gamboa-OñateDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Hospital de San José - Sociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia.
Nicolás Rincón-AriasDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Hospital de San José - Sociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4081-5924
Matías BaldonciniSchool of Medicine, Laboratory of Microsurgical Neuroanatomy, Second Chair of Gross Anatomy, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9323-8306
Ivo KehayovDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5799-1739
Yovany A Capacho-DelgadoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Hospital de San José - Sociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia.
María L MonsalveResearch Division, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Bogotá, Colombia.
Paula RobayoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Hospital de San José - Sociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia.
Paula PulidoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Hospital de San José - Sociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia.
Ivanna Solano-CuellarDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Hospital de San José - Sociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia.
Laura RamírezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Hospital de San José - Sociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia.
Diego A Ruiz-DiazDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Hospital de San José - Sociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia.
Javier G Patiño-GómezDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Hospital de San José - Sociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia.
Oscar ZorroDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Hospital de San José - Sociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9362-2487
Hernando A Cifuentes-LobeloDepartament of Neurosurgery, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Hospital Infantil Universitario de San José, Bogotá, Colombia.
Laura Baeza-AntónDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine/New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Edgar G Ordóñez-RubianoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud (FUCS), Hospital de San José - Sociedad de Cirugía de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1179-5825

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The goal of a decompressive craniectomy (DC) or a hinge craniotomy (HC), is to treat intracranial hypertension and reduce mortality. Traditionally, the decompression procedure has been performed with cranial bone removal. However, decompression and repositioning the cranial bone, named HC, has been presented as an alternative for certain cases. Our objective is to describe the neuroradiological and clinical preoperative factors and outcomes in traumatic brain injury (TBI) cases treated with both techniques in 2 centers in a Middle-Income country. Methods: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of adult patients who underwent decompression surgical treatment for TBI, either with a traditional DC or HC, in 2 centers in Bogotá, Colombia between 2016-2020. Results: This study involved 30 cases that underwent HC and 20 that underwent DC. 78% were male with an overall mean age of 50.2 years. 66% cases had traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (tSAH) and 60% had evidence of acute subdural hematoma ≥10 mm in thickness. The overall mortality rate during hospitalization was 20%. Preoperative pupil impairment differences between the 2 groups were statistically significant ( Conclusion: This study reveals that using a traditional DC or HC depends on the neurosurgeon's intraoperative case-by-case assessment according to the intraoperative brain's vitality and the presence of diffuse edema in the brain parenchyma at the time of surgical closure. Each case requires an individualized evaluation before and during surgery. The preoperative pupil condition can serve as a marker for HC or DC selection.

Indexed as

Brain injuries, traumaticCraniotomyDecompressive craniectomyDeveloping countriesIntracranial hypertension

Identifiers

PMID39803346
PMCPMC11711026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.