Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39803319›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2025

Cryopreservation Method for Preventing Freeze-Fracture of Small Muscle Samples.

Namrata Ghag, Joshua Tam, Rox R Anderson, Nashwa Cheema

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Namrata GhagWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Joshua TamWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Rox R AndersonWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Nashwa CheemaWellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histological techniques to study muscle are crucial for assessing skeletal muscle health. To preserve tissue morphology, samples are usually fixed in formaldehyde or cryopreserved immediately after excision from the body. Freezing samples in liquid nitrogen, using isopentane as a mediator for efficient cooling, preserves the tissue in its natural state. However, this method is highly susceptible to freeze-fracture artifacts, which alter or destroy tissue architecture. Isopentane is most commonly used in a semi-frozen/liquid state that is visually assessed by the experimenter, which can pose a challenge when freezing multiple tissues at a time or maintaining a consistent temperature. Furthermore, tissue size is also a confounding factor; depending on the size, freezing times can vary. In this study, we compare two different options for using isopentane while cryopreserving tissue. We also present an easy and reproducible method of freezing the soleus tissue of mice using frozen isopentane. This method decreased the occurrence of freeze-fractures by an order of magnitude, to ~4%, whereas the traditional method of cryopreservation resulted in ~56% freeze-fracturing. Key features • A uniform and highly reproducible protocol for freezing any tissue that is prone to freeze-fracture. • Removes the need to maintain a mixed state of isopentane. • Optimized cryopreservation method for the soleus muscle of mice. • Allows for prevention of peripheral freeze-fracture in tissue, which is the most susceptible region to freeze-fracture damage. Graphical overview.

Indexed as

CryopreservationFreeze-fractureHistologyMouseMuscleSoleus

Identifiers

PMID39803319
PMCPMC11717720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.