Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39803180›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2025

Verbal Encoding Strategies in Visuo-Spatial Working Memory.

Joana Pereira Seabra, Vivien Chopurian, Alessandra S Souza, Thomas B Christophel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Lesion-Based Disconnectome Explains Cognitive Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joana Pereira SeabraDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, DE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5868-3321
Vivien ChopurianDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, DE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5446-7798
Alessandra S SouzaFaculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, PT.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1057-8426
Thomas B ChristophelDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, DE.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3506-0850

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual working memory and verbal storage are often investigated independently of one another. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that naming visual stimuli can provide an advantage in performance during visual working memory tasks. On the other hand, there is also evidence that labeling could lead to biases in recall. Here, we present an exploratory investigation of verbal labels associated with the memorization of simple visuo-spatial stimuli, and how the use of these labels informs recall behavior of the same stimuli in a separate working memory task. English-speaking participants performed a working memory task with orientation and location stimuli, followed by a separate naming task featuring the same stimuli. We found a diverse set of labels employed frequently and with a consistent distribution across stimulus types, the stimulus space, and among participants. The use of individual spatial words, predicted class 1 cardinal biases in memory (i.e. the observation that cardinal stimuli are more accurately recalled than non-cardinal ones). Conversely, words expressing uncertainty (e.g. 'slightly', 'near') predicted class 2 cardinal bias (i.e. recall biases away from the cardinal planes). This relationship between word use and recall biases is consistent with shared representational resources that are used for both visuo-spatial and verbal working memory.

Indexed as

categorizationverbal labelingvisuo-spatial stimuliworking memory

Identifiers

PMID39803180
PMCPMC11720477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.