Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39803168›Full record

SynthesisJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Describing Sacrocolpopexy in Medical Literature: A Proposed Surgical Classification System.

Daniel T Nassar, Michael Shu, Molly Dorroh, Dhara Kadakia, Abeer Eddib

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel T NassarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA. (Drs. Nassar and Kadakia).
Michael ShuDepartment of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Kaleida Health Systems, Millard Fillmore Suburban Hospital, Williamsville, New York, USA. (Drs. Shu, Dorroh, and Eddib).
Molly DorrohDepartment of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Kaleida Health Systems, Millard Fillmore Suburban Hospital, Williamsville, New York, USA. (Drs. Shu, Dorroh, and Eddib).
Dhara KadakiaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA. (Drs. Nassar and Kadakia).
Abeer EddibWestern New York Urology Associates, Cheektowaga, New York, USA. (Dr. Eddib).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sacrocolpopexy has become a favored treatment of pelvic organ prolapse due to its durability and efficacy. Sacrocolpopexy has not been standardized and there is no categorization scheme to facilitate communication or research efforts for the procedure. A systematic review was conducted to facilitate construction of a classification system for sacrocolpopexy based on extent of vaginal dissection described in the medical literature. Methods: A systematic review of EMBASE and Medline databases was performed with inclusion criteria of randomized control trials published in the English language. Database entries were reviewed for relevance and, after thorough screening, 52 articles met criteria for analysis. Results: Abdominal, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches were represented in 20, 33, and 20 studies, respectively. In 50% of the reviewed articles (n = 26), extent of anterior dissection was not provided. Dissection to the bladder trigone and bladder neck were found in 37% (n = 19) and the proximal vagina in 13% (n = 7) of studies. In the posterior compartment, 48% (n = 25) did not describe extent of dissection, whereas 15% (n = 8) referenced dissection along the full length of the vagina. Only 2% (n = 1) discussed dissection to the dorsal perineal membrane, 12% described dissection to the perineal body (n = 6), 10% to the distal vagina (n = 5), and 13% (n = 7) to the proximal vagina. Conclusion: Lack of standardization in surgical techniques creates inconsistencies in research on sacrocolpopexy. The systematic review presented informs and demonstrates a framework for classifying sacrocolpopexy based on the extent of dissection in the published literature. This categorization scheme is the first step in standardizing the technique which can aid research efforts and physician communication by unifying language about sacrocolpopexy.

Indexed as

Gynecologic Surgical ProceduresPelvic Organ ProlapseVaginaFemaleHumansDissectionProlapseSacrocolpoperineopexySacrocolpopexy

Identifiers

PMID39803168
PMCPMC11723571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.