Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39803162›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Analysis of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Self-Medication Among Students and Staff of a Caribbean Medical School.

Ramesh Lolla, Chandramouli Krishna Kotakala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ramesh LollaPharmacology, Trinity School of Medicine, St. Vincent, ABW.
Chandramouli Krishna KotakalaPharmacology, Maharaja's Institute of Medical Sciences, Vizianagaram, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Self-medication is commonly practiced, especially among medical students, administrative staff, and faculty from preclinical and paraclinical departments, driven by accessibility, familiarity with medications, and perceived convenience. This study explored the incidence, patterns, and factors influencing self-medication within the Xavier University School of Medicine, Aruba, with a primary focus on medical students and administrative staff. The faculty included in the study were from preclinical and paraclinical departments such as anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, pathology, forensic medicine, microbiology, and community medicine. Methods A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted among medical students, administrative staff, and faculty from preclinical departments. Data were gathered through a pre-designed, standardized, and anonymous electronic questionnaire in English, which included both open-ended questions for qualitative insights and close-ended questions for structured quantitative analysis. Open-ended questions allowed participants to provide detailed, personalized responses, offering qualitative insights into their self-medication practices and related experiences. Closed-ended questions, on the other hand, provided structured answer choices, facilitating the collection of quantitative data for statistical analysis. This combination enabled a thorough exploration of demographic details, self-medication behaviors, and the factors influencing these practices.  Results Allopathic medicines were the most frequently used, reported by 34 respondents (63%), primarily sourced from pharmacies by 43 respondents (79.6%). These medicines were commonly administered directly from bottles, spoons, or measuring devices, as reported by 37 respondents (68.5%). Saving time was the primary reason for self-medication, cited by 18 respondents (33.3%), followed by lack of insurance or prior familiarity with the medication, noted by nine respondents (16.7%). Adverse effects were reported by seven respondents (13%), with drowsiness and stomach pain being the most frequent issues. Risks such as delayed diagnosis and drug resistance were also mentioned. Despite these concerns, 40 respondents (74.1%) acknowledged that self-medication could be hazardous, yet 44 respondents (81.5%) continued the practice. Additionally, 13 respondents (24.1%) felt adequately educated to self-medicate, and 37 respondents (68.5%) supported incorporating self-medication education into formal medical curricula. Conclusion Self-medication was widespread among medical students, administrative staff, and preclinical and paraclinical faculty, driven by convenience and accessibility but accompanied by risks of adverse effects and delayed diagnosis. Integrating self-medication education into medical curricula and raising awareness can foster safer healthcare behaviors and improve outcomes.

Indexed as

adverse effectsallopathic drugscross-sectional studymedical educationmedical studentsself-medication

Identifiers

PMID39803162
PMCPMC11725286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.