ArticleCureus2024
Short- and Medium-Term Outcomes Assessment of Urethral Prostatic Lift (UroLift) as a Minimally Invasive Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in a Tertiary Care Centre.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
aimBenign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the enlargement and overgrowth of the prostate leading to the compression of the urethra and resulting in obstruction to the outflow of urine. Prostatic urethral lift (UroLift) is a budding minimally invasive technique that utilises mechanical manipulation of the prostate tissue so that the urethra is free from compression, thereby creating a channel for the outflow of urine. The aim of the audit was to assess the short- to medium-term outcomes in our centre in terms of improvement in symptoms, quality of life (QoL) and complication rates.
methodA retrospective observational study was employed. All patients who had UroLift procedure between December 2021 and December 2022 were included.
resultsSixty-four patients were found for the chosen period. Age ranged between 48 and 91 with a mean age of 73. The average prostate size was 48.63 g (31-50 g). Of the patients, 64% (n=41) had the procedure performed under general anaesthesia, whilst the rest had either regional or local anaesthesia or entonox. Two to eight clips were used per patient, with four being the median number of clips. Furthermore, 53.13% (n=34) had a catheter post-procedure, with 52.94% (n=18) of these achieving trial without catheter (TWOC) in less than seven days. Of the patients, 67.18% (n=43) had no complications, 7.8% (n=5) went into acute urinary retention requiring short-term catheterisation, 1.56% (n=1) had bleeding requiring blood transfusion and 6.25% (n=4) had infection. Overall, 17.18% (n=11) had failure of procedure requiring other forms of intervention for BPH at two years post-operatively. The median improvement in post-void residual scan and quality of life (QoL) scores were 58 mL and 1.5, respectively.
conclusionAlthough transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the gold standard surgical treatment for BPH, UroLift offers a less minimally invasive approach with better short-term recovery, preservation of sexual function and low complication profile. The failure rate from UroLift from previous studies falls within the range of 7%-22%, and the figures attained in our centre are comparable to these.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.