ArticleCureus2024
Benefits of Continuous Outpatient Orthopedic Consultations for Both Upper and Lower Body on the Mortality Rates of Hemodialysis Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of the present observational study was to examine whether there is a difference in prognosis for hemodialysis patients with or without continued orthopedic outpatient visits over five years. Methods: One hundred and thirteen hemodialysis patients who visited the dialysis center of Takagi Hospital, Okawa, Japan, as of December 2017 were included in this study. Data were collected from the medical records until December 2022. All 113 patients were divided into two groups: patients who continuously visited the orthopedic outpatient department (n = 59) and those who did not (n = 54). Patients who had orthopedic consultation were divided into three semi-groups: patients who consulted for the upper body (n = 11), the lower body (n = 22), and both the upper and lower bodies (n = 26).
resultsDuring the five-year follow-up period, 13 out of 59 patients (22.0%) who had orthopedic consultation died, and this ratio tended to be lower compared to the mortality rate of patients without orthopedic consultation (37.0%) but not significant (P < 0.08). Duration of hemodialysis was significantly longer in patients with orthopedic consultation (P = 0.009). The mortality rate was significantly lower in patients who consulted for both upper and lower bodies than those without orthopedic consultation (P < 0.05, respectively). These differences were not observed in patients who consulted for only upper or lower bodies.
conclusionThe mortality of hemodialysis patients was significantly lower in the group which was undertaking continuous outpatient orthopedic consultations for both upper and lower bodies, which suggested that periodical consultation with orthopedics might be critical for hemodialysis patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.