ArticleCureus2024
Bifrontal Craniectomy: A High-Yield Surgical Training Tool.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Curriculum Enhancing Anatomical Publications at Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine.Cureus · 2026Review
- Reappraising the bifrontal decompressive craniectomy: A systematic literature review of indications, outcomes, and clinical applications.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bifrontal decompressive craniectomy (DC), which was once a popular technique for treating midline mass lesions, has seen a notable decline in its therapeutic use within modern neurosurgery. Despite its diminished clinical use, the procedure offers considerable value as an educational tool for surgical training. This study used a Thiel-embalmed cadaver to demonstrate the bifrontal DC procedure, including a Souttar incision, strategic (MacCarty, zygomatic, and apical) keyhole/burr hole placement, superior sagittal sinus suturing, left frontal lobe decortication, and microscopic visualization of the anterior cranial fossa. The procedure demonstrated educational value in three ways: first, wide anatomical exposure enables a detailed discussion of tissue handling. Second, an efficient training paradigm that allows multiple surgical techniques to be taught within a limited timeframe. Third, it offers risk management training focusing on superior sagittal sinus protection. While bifrontal DC has selective therapeutic applications, its potential as a teaching tool is undervalued. The procedure's wide exposure creates an ideal platform for surgical education, allowing residents to develop skills in a structured environment. We advocate its use in training programs by focusing on its educational benefits rather than its limited therapeutic role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.