ArticleCureus2024
The Prevalence of Alveolar Ridge Defects According to Seibert's Classification: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Rehabilitation of a Maxillary Defect and Missing Teeth in the Esthetic Zone With a Long-Span Fixed Dental Prosthesis: A Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Alveolar ridge defects in partially edentulous patients present significant challenges in prosthodontic treatment planning. Seibert's classification system provides a structured approach to categorizing these defects based on the buccolingual and apico-coronal dimensions of the ridge. Accurate classification is crucial for determining appropriate treatment strategies for implant placement, fixed prosthesis, or tissue augmentation. Hence, this study aimed to assess and classify tissue defects in partially edentulous ridges based on Seibert's classification Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted to measure and classify alveolar ridge defects in partially edentulous patients by using Seibert's classification system. Patients aged 18 years and above with partially edentulous ridges requiring prosthodontic treatment were considered for inclusion. Individuals with systemic conditions affecting healing, completely edentulous patients, and those with active periodontal infections were excluded. Impressions of dental arches were obtained, and the alveolar ridge dimensions were measured using digital calipers. Results The study included 122 participants, with a slight male predominance (n=65, 53.3%). The classification of alveolar ridge defects revealed that 71 (58.2%) were Class III, 33 (27.0%) were Class I, and 18 (14.8%) were Class II. A chi-square analysis indicated no significant association between sex and the classification of alveolar ridge defects (p=0.410). Conclusions The prevalence of Class III alveolar ridge defects highlights the need for tailored treatment approaches in prosthetic rehabilitation. While gender differences were observed, they did not significantly influence defect classification. Future research should investigate additional demographic factors to enhance understanding and improve treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.