Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39803013›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

The Role of Telemedicine in Emergency Department Triage and Patient Care: A Systematic Review.

Anas A Ahmed, Mohammed E Mojiri, Ali A Daghriri, Ohoud A Hakami, Reem F Alruwaili, Rayan A Khan, Hassan A Madkhali, Manar M Almania, Zaher T Hakami, Khadijah O Mashraqi and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Global Emergency Medicine: A Scoping Review of the Literature From 2024.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Anas A AhmedCommunity Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Mohammed E MojiriCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Ali A DaghririCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Ohoud A HakamiCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Reem F AlruwailiCollege of Medicine, Al Jouf University, Sakakah, SAU.
Rayan A KhanCollege of Medicine, Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies, Jeddah, SAU.
Hassan A MadkhaliCollege of Pharmacy, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Manar M AlmaniaCollege of Medicine, Majmaah University, Al Majma'ah, SAU.
Zaher T HakamiCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Khadijah O MashraqiCollege of Medicine, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, BHR.
Khowlah A AdawiCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Sadeel A AlqattanCollege of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, SAU.
Ahmad N AlharbiCollege of Medicine, Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies, Jeddah, SAU.
Malek A AlbahlolCollege of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Atheer I MoafaCollege of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overcrowding in emergency departments (EDs) is a global challenge, leading to prolonged waiting times and adverse patient outcomes. Telemedicine has emerged as a promising solution, enabling remote consultation, triage, and real-time specialist input. Despite its growing application, limited systematic research exists on its specific role in ED triage and care. This systematic review evaluated the effectiveness of telemedicine interventions in ED settings, focusing on diagnostic accuracy, patient satisfaction, throughput times, and re-admission rates. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases was conducted up to November 10, 2024. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in English that assessed telemedicine in ED settings. Two independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the modified Downs and Black scale. Six RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Results showed that telemedicine improved diagnostic accuracy, reduced re-consultation rates, and enhanced treatment adherence. High diagnostic concordance with in-person assessments was observed, particularly in non-critical cases. Several studies reported shorter throughput times and higher patient satisfaction with telemedicine compared to traditional care. However, telemedicine's impact on high-acuity cases, such as emergency airway management, was less pronounced. Limitations included small sample sizes and the inability to blind participants, which may have influenced outcomes. Telemedicine holds significant potential to improve ED triage and care in non-critical cases, reducing waiting times and enhancing patient outcomes. Further research is needed to establish its efficacy in high-acuity settings and address challenges related to infrastructure and privacy. Telemedicine should complement in-person care as part of an integrated ED strategy.

Indexed as

diagnostic accuracyemergency departmenthealthcare efficiencypatient carepatient satisfactionremote consultationsystematic reviewtelemedicinetriage

Identifiers

PMID39803013
PMCPMC11717904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.