Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39802957›Full record

ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2025

Development and Validation of a Prognostic Molecular Phenotype and Clinical Characterization in Grade III Diffuse Gliomas Treatment with Radio-Chemotherapy.

Weiguo Gu, Jiaming Tang, Penghui Liu, Jinyu Gan, Jianfei Lai, Jinbiao Xu, Jianxiong Deng, Chaoxing Liu, Yuhua Wang, Guohua Zhang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Weiguo Gu *Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China.
Jiaming Tang *Department of Oncology, Gaoxin Branch of the First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China.
Penghui LiuDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China.
Jinyu GanDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China.
Jianfei LaiDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China.
Jinbiao XuDepartment of Oncology, Gaoxin Branch of the First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China.
Jianxiong DengDepartment of Oncology, Gaoxin Branch of the First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China.
Chaoxing LiuDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0006-8015-6612
Yuhua WangDepartment of Oncology, Gaoxin Branch of the First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China.
Guohua ZhangNanchang Key Laboratory of Tumor Gene Diagnosis and Innovative Treatment Research, Gaoxin Branch of the First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China.
Feng YuDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China.
Chao ShiDepartment of Oncology, Gaoxin Branch of the First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China.
Ke FangDepartment of Oncology, Gaoxin Branch of the First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-5675-9900
Feng QiuDepartment of Oncology, Gaoxin Branch of the First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The relationship between molecular phenotype and prognosis in high-grade gliomas (WHO III and IV, HGG) treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy is not fully understood and needs further exploration. Methods: The HGG patients following surgery and treatment with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to assess the independent prognostic factors. The nomogram model was established, and its accuracy was determined via the calibration plots. Results: A total of 215 and 88 patients had grade III glioma and grade IV glioma, respectively. Grade III oligodendroglioma (OG-G3) patients had the longest mPFS and mOS than other grade III pathology, while grade III astrocytoma (AA-G3) patients were close to IDH-1 wildtype glioblastoma (GBM) and had a poor prognosis. The IDH-1 mutant group had a better mPFS and mOS than the IDH-1 wildtype group in all grade III patients, OG-G3 and AA-G3 patients. Furthermore, 1p/19q co-deletion group had a longer mPFS and mOS than 1p/19q non-deletion group in all grade III patients. IDH-1 mutation and 1p/19q co-deletion patients had the best prognosis than other molecular types. Also, the MGMT methylation and IDH-1 mutation or 1p/19q co-deletion group had a longer mPFS and mOS than the MGMT unmethylation and IDH-1 wildtype or 1p/19q non-codeletion of grade III patients. In addition, the low Ki-67 expression group had a better prognosis than high Ki-67 expression group in grade III patients. Univariate and multivariate COX showed that 1p/19q co-deletion and MGMT methylation were the independent prognostic factors for mPFS and mOS. The calibration curve showed that the established nomogram could well predict the survival based on these covariates. Conclusion: The AA-G3 with IDH-1 wildtype, MGMT unmethylation or 1p/19q non-codeletion patients was resistant to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, has a poor prognosis and needs a more active treatment.

Indexed as

gliomanomogramprognosisradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39802957
PMCPMC11721490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.