ArticleMetabolic engineering communications2025
Co-consumption for plastics upcycling: A perspective.
Article in Metabolic engineering communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- EngineeringiScience · 2026Article
- Advancing Sustainability in Modern Polymer Processing: Strategies for Waste Resource Recovery and Circular Economy Integration.Polymers · 2025Review
- Physiology-informed use of Cupriavidus necator in biomanufacturing: a review of advances and challenges.Microbial cell factories · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing plastics end-of-life crisis threatens ecosystems and human health globally. Microbial plastic degradation and upcycling have emerged as potential solutions to this complex challenge, but their industrial feasibility and limitations thereon have not been fully characterized. In this perspective paper, we review literature describing both plastic degradation and transformation of plastic monomers into value-added products by microbes. We aim to understand the current feasibility of combining these into a single, closed-loop process. Our analysis shows that microbial plastic degradation is currently the rate-limiting step to "closing the loop", with reported rates that are orders of magnitude lower than those of pathways to upcycle plastic degradation products. We further find that neither degradation nor upcycling have been demonstrated at rates sufficiently high to justify industrialization at present. As a potential way to address these limitations, we suggest more investigation into mixotrophic approaches, showing that those which leverage the unique properties of plastic degradation products such as ethylene glycol might improve rates sufficiently to motivate industrial process development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.