ArticleGastroenterology research2024
Risk Factors Predicting Outcomes in Advanced Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.
Article in Gastroenterology research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have moved to the frontline in recent years to manage upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tumors, such as esophageal and gastric cancers. This retrospective review sheds light on real-world data on ICI-treated UGI tumors to identify risk factors (clinical and pathological) impacting the outcome other than traditional biomarkers (programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) or microsatellite instability status). Methods: Patients with UGI tumors who received at least one dose of ICI for stage IV or recurrent disease between January 1, 2015, and July 31, 2021, at The Ohio State University were included in the study. The patients' baseline characteristics, labs, and blood counts (even at disease progression) were extracted with survival outcomes (progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)). Descriptive statistics, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model for survival outcomes, Fisher exact test for categorical variables, were conducted using JMP Pro 16 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Results: We had 64 patients (84% males) included in the study, with the racial distribution as follows: 88% Caucasian, 5% African American, 1% Asian, and 6% from other racial groups. Men and the use of ICI in third lines or more had a positive impact on PFS and OS. For OS, 1) history of surgery positively impacted the outcome, while bone metastases worsened it; 2) baseline red blood cell count (RBC), hemoglobin, and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) negatively impacted the OS. For PFS, 1) PD-L1 positivity, baseline lymphocyte count, and aspartate transferase levels had a positive impact; 2) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positivity, baseline RBC, TSH, alkaline phosphatase, and alanine transferase (AST) levels had a negative impact. A slight increase in white blood cell (WBC) count (by 1.54, P = 0.02) and a drop in lymphocyte count (by 0.1907, P = 0.003) was significantly associated with disease progression. Conclusions: Baseline risk factors and monitoring blood counts can help predict outcomes in ICI-treated UGI tumors. We need larger studies to confirm this.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.