Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39802923›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025

Experience of Contraceptive Denial, Perceived Ease of Future Access to Contraception, and Adverse Mental Health Outcomes in Polish Women.

Morgan Jade, Magdalena Ewa Mijas, Grazyna Jasienska, Andrzej Galbarczyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Morgan JadeSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9407-6580
Magdalena Ewa MijasDepartment of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5471-3725
Grazyna JasienskaDepartment of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8716-6342
Andrzej GalbarczykDepartment of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7879-9735

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: While several studies demonstrate an association between reproductive coercion or a lack of reproductive autonomy and decreased mental health in women, little is known about potential mental health impacts when women are denied prescription contraceptives. The aim of this research was to explore associations between prescription contraceptive denial and perceived ease of future access to contraception, and self-assessed mental health. Patients and Methods: Polish women (N=424) completed an anonymous online survey with demographic questions; perceived stress (PSS-10), state anxiety (STAI-X1), and depression (CESD-R) assessments, and contraceptive access questions. Results: Eighty-eight participants (21%) had experienced at least one episode of prescription contraceptive denial from a doctor or pharmacist. There were no differences in stress, anxiety, and depression scores between women who had and had not ever experienced denial. However, women who had experienced contraceptive denial within the last six months, had higher depression scores. In addition, women who perceived future access as very easy had the lowest stress, anxiety and depression scores. Conclusion: These results suggest that experiences and attitudes related to contraceptive access are related to perceived stress, anxiety, and depression. Contraceptive denial and other access barriers constitute a significant public health issue that may impact the health of women.

Indexed as

conscientious objectionreproductive autonomyreproductive coercionsexual health

Identifiers

PMID39802923
PMCPMC11720636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.