ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
Enhanced neurological anomaly detection in MRI images using deep convolutional neural networks.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical application of artificial intelligence technology in epilepsy.Acta epileptologica · 2026Review
- Deep learning-based image classification for AI-assisted integration of pathology and radiology in medical imaging.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Advancements in Imaging Technologies and AI Integration for Neurodegenerative Disease Management: A Narrative Review.Molecular imagingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, and epilepsy, pose significant diagnostic and treatment challenges due to their complexity and the gradual degeneration of central nervous system structures. This study introduces a deep learning framework designed to automate neuro-diagnostics, addressing the limitations of current manual interpretation methods, which are often time-consuming and prone to variability. Methods: We propose a specialized deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) framework aimed at detecting and classifying neurological anomalies in MRI data. Our approach incorporates key preprocessing techniques, such as reducing noise and normalizing image intensity in MRI scans, alongside an optimized model architecture. The model employs Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) activation functions, the Adam optimizer, and a random search strategy to fine-tune hyper-parameters like learning rate, batch size, and the number of neurons in fully connected layers. To ensure reliability and broad applicability, cross-fold validation was used. Results and discussion: Our DCNN achieved a remarkable classification accuracy of 98.44%, surpassing well-known models such as ResNet-50 and AlexNet when evaluated on a comprehensive MRI dataset. Moreover, performance metrics such as precision, recall, and F1-score were calculated separately, confirming the robustness and efficiency of our model across various evaluation criteria. Statistical analyses, including ANOVA and t-tests, further validated the significance of the performance improvements observed with our proposed method. This model represents an important step toward creating a fully automated system for diagnosing and planning treatment for neurological diseases. The high accuracy of our framework highlights its potential to improve diagnostic workflows by enabling precise detection, tracking disease progression, and supporting personalized treatment strategies. While the results are promising, further research is necessary to assess how the model performs across different clinical scenarios. Future studies could focus on integrating additional data types, such as longitudinal imaging and multimodal techniques, to further enhance diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility. These findings mark a significant advancement in applying deep learning to neuro-diagnostics, with promising implications for improving patient outcomes and clinical practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.