Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39802880›Full record

ArticleJournal of hand and microsurgery2025

Evaluation of the results of reconstruction of large bony defects of humerus using vascularized bone grafts.

Mustafa Youssef, Mohamed AbdalMoneim Hafez, Ahmed Elsayed Semaya, Amr El-Sayed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hand and microsurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mustafa YoussefEl Hadra University Hospital, Department of Orthopedics Surgery and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Mohamed AbdalMoneim HafezEl Hadra University Hospital, Department of Orthopedics Surgery and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Ahmed Elsayed SemayaEl Hadra University Hospital, Department of Orthopedics Surgery and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Amr El-SayedDepartment of Orthopedics Surgery and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vascularized bone grafts (VBGs) are currently the main surgical option for the restoration of humeral bone defects particularly when defects are larger than 6 cm. Because it offers a strong, rapid blood supply, VBGs easily integrate into the recipient sites and undergo active resorption and remodeling into healthy bone through primary bone healing. Additionally, they support the recipient site's immune system in preventing and reducing infection. Patients and methods: This study comprised twenty patients with major humeral bony defects treated by vascularized bone grafts. Under general anesthesia, the procedure was carried out with the patient in the supine position for free fibula harvesting or in the lateral or prone position for pedicled scapular graft harvesting. Results: The union rate was 90 % and the mean healing time was 7.78 ± 3.04 months. Complications were present in 40 % of cases, with non-union being the most common, followed by infection and wound dehiscence. Conclusion: The study suggests that the reconstruction of large bony defects of humerus using vascularized bone grafts is effective, with a predictable healing time and a manageable complication rate.

Indexed as

HumerusNon unionReconstructionVascularized fibula

Identifiers

PMID39802880
PMCPMC11718330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.