ArticleBrain & spine2025
Predictive factors for ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement in aneurysmatic subarachnoid hemorrhages.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Causing Hydrocephalus: Narrative Review of a Neurosurgical Emergency.Cureus · 2026Review
- Development of the IS-Score: A Novel Predictive Model for Shunt Requirement Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Early Prediction of External Ventricular Drain Weaning Trial Outcome in Patients with SAH Based on ICP Pulse Morphological Similarity: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Analysis.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Changes in serum sodium during an external ventricular drain weaning in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Letter regarding Pereira et al.'s SAH-VP score: Methodological and statistical considerations.Brain & spine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Aneurysmatic subarachnoid hemorrhages (aSAH) are life-threatening events with high mortality and morbidity. Hydrocephalus is a common complication, initially managed with an external ventricular drain (EVD). Persistent hydrocephalus often requires ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement to relieve intracranial pressure and prevent further neurological damage. Research question: What factors predict the need for VPS placement in patients with aSAH, and how does a new predictive model compare to the Mayo Age, Grades, EVD score (MAGE score)? Materials and methods: A retrospective study of 105 patients with aSAH treated with EVD between 2014 and 2023 was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups: those requiring VPS (n= 45) and those not requiring VPS (n= 60). Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment variables were analysed, and a new predictive model (SAH-VP) was developed and compared to the MAGE score. Results: Patients who required VPS had higher WFNS scores on admission (p= 0.045), more infections requiring antibiotics (p= 0.002), more failed weaning attempts (p= 0.004), more failed closure attempts (p= 0.002), and longer EVD use (p< 0.01). The new SAH-VP model demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.800. Discussion and conclusion: There is no consensus on the factors predicting VPS need in SAH patients. This study identified key predictors and developed a new predictive model, SAH-VP, which could improve patient management by identifying those at higher risk of requiring VPS, offering an alternative to the existing MAGE score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.