ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Comparison of Machine Learning Models in Predicting Mental Health Sequelae Following Concussion in Youth.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Youth who experience concussions may be at greater risk for subsequent mental health challenges, making early detection crucial for timely intervention. This study utilized Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) networks to predict mental health outcomes following concussion in youth and compared its performance to traditional models. We also examined whether incorporating social determinants of health (SDoH) improved predictive power, given the disproportionate impact of concussions and mental health issues on disadvantaged populations. We evaluated the models using accuracy, area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and other performance metrics. Our BiLSTM model with SDoH data achieved the highest accuracy (0.883) and AUC-ROC score (0.892). Unlike traditional models, our approach provided real-time predictions at each visit within 12 months of the index concussion, aiding clinicians in making timely, visit-specific referrals for further treatment and interventions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.