Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39802782›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025

Feasibility of real-time fMRI neurofeedback for rehabilitation of reading deficits in aphasia.

Olga Boukrina, Abubakar Yamin, Guang H Yue, Yekyung Kong, Yury Koush

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04875936 (Rehabilitation of Reading Deficits in Subacute Stroke Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04875936 narecruitingnot on this map

Rehabilitation of Reading Deficits in Subacute Stroke Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Neurofeedback and Motor Imagery

TypeinterventionalSponsorKessler FoundationRan2023 to 2027Enrolled28ConditionsStroke, Dyslexia, AcquiredArmsMotor Imagery and Real-Time fMRI Neurofeedback, Motor Imagery and Sham fMRI Neurofeedback
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Olga BoukrinaCenter for Stroke Rehabilitation Research, Kessler Foundation, 1199 Pleasant Valley Way, West Orange, NJ, 07052, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4298-2893
Abubakar YaminCenter for Autism Research, Kessler Foundation, 120 Eagle Rock Avenue, East Hanover, NJ, 07936, USA.
Guang H YueDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, 185 S Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.
Yekyung KongKessler Institute for Rehabilitation, 1199 Pleasant Valley Way, West Orange, NJ, 07052, USA.
Yury KoushCenter for Neurobiology and Brain Rehabilitation, Skolkovo Institute of Technology, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

Rehabilitation of Reading Deficits in Subacute Stroke using fMRI Neurofeedback and Motor ImageryK01DC019178 · NIDCD · KESSLER FOUNDATION, INC. · PI BOUKRINA, OLGA · 2021 to 2025
$657k
NIDCD NIH HHS K01 DC019178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reading impairments, a common consequence of stroke-induced aphasia, significantly hinder life participation, affecting both functional and leisure activities. Traditional post-stroke rehabilitation strategies often show limited generalization beyond trained materials, underscoring the need for novel interventions targeting the underlying neural mechanisms. Method: This study investigates the feasibility and potential effectiveness of real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) neurofeedback (NFB) intervention for reading deficits associated with stroke and aphasia. We enrolled left-hemisphere stroke survivors in the subacute recovery period and healthy controls in an fMRI NFB intervention study focusing on increasing activation within the left supramarginal gyrus (SMG), a critical region for reading supporting orthography-phonology conversion. Results: Preliminary findings demonstrate that stroke participants showed significant improvements in reading comprehension and phonological awareness, as evidenced by marked gains on the Reading Comprehension Battery for Aphasia (RCBA) and a phonology two-alternative forced choice test. Functional MRI results indicated that stroke participants exhibited increased activation from day 1 to day 3 of NFB training within the left SMG and the broader left hemisphere reading network, particularly during challenging nonword reading tasks. Healthy controls also showed increased activation during NFB regulation and reading tasks, but these changes were outside the traditional reading network, involving regions associated with cognitive control, reward anticipation, and learning. In both stroke participants and healthy controls, we also found changes in dynamic functional connectivity of multiple resting state networks from before to after NFB training. Conclusions: Although preliminary, this research contributes to the development of biologically informed interventions for reading deficits in aphasia, representing an early step towards improving post-stroke rehabilitation outcomes. Future randomized controlled trials are necessary to validate these findings by including a sham NFB control group within a larger participant sample. Registration: The study was preregistered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT# NCT04875936.

Indexed as

aphasia rehabilitationfMRIneurofeedbackreadingstroke

Identifiers

PMID39802782
PMCPMC11722485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.