Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39802741›Full record

ArticleHorticulture research2025

Revisiting the role of light signaling in plant responses to salt stress.

Yinxia Peng, Haiyan Zhu, Yiting Wang, Jin Kang, Lixia Hu, Ling Li, Kangyou Zhu, Jiarong Yan, Xin Bu, Xiujie Wang and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Horticulture research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Overexpression and silencing of the cottonFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Yinxia PengCollege of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Haiyan ZhuCollege of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Yiting WangCollege of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Jin KangCollege of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Lixia HuCollege of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Ling LiCollege of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Kangyou ZhuCollege of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Jiarong YanCollege of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Xin BuCollege of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Xiujie WangCollege of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Ying ZhangCollege of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Xin SunCollege of Land and Environment, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Golam Jalal AhammedCollege of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9621-8431
Chao JiangSchool of Agriculture, Hulunbuir University, Hulunbuir 021008, China.
Sida MengCollege of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Yufeng LiuCollege of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Zhouping SunCollege of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Mingfang QiCollege of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Tianlai LiCollege of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.
Feng WangCollege of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5351-1531

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As one of the grave environmental hazards, soil salinization seriously limits crop productivity, growth, and development. When plants are exposed to salt stress, they suffer a sequence of damage mainly caused by osmotic stress, ion toxicity, and subsequently oxidative stress. As sessile organisms, plants have developed many physiological and biochemical strategies to mitigate the impact of salt stress. These strategies include altering root development direction, shortening the life cycle, accelerating dormancy, closing stomata to reduce transpiration, and decreasing biomass. Apart from being a prime energy source, light is an environmental signal that profoundly influences plant growth and development and also participates in plants' response to salt stress. This review summarizes the regulatory network of salt tolerance by light signals in plants, which is vital to further understanding plants' adaptation to high salinity. In addition, the review highlights potential future uses of genetic engineering and light supplement technology by light-emitting diode (LED) to improve crop growth in saline-alkali environments in order to make full use of the vast saline land.

Identifiers

PMID39802741
PMCPMC11718397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.