Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39802709›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of radiology & imaging2025

Historiography of Scientific Publishing across Cultures and Disciplines.

Bharat Hosur, Manjul Tripathi, Sameer Vyas, Sikandar Shaikh, Chirag K Ahuja

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of radiology & imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bharat HosurDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8622-3824
Manjul TripathiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5679-3439
Sameer VyasDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0113-0486
Sikandar ShaikhDepartment of Radiology, Shadan Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8519-9973
Chirag K AhujaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0734-3252

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historiography is a vital perspective of our scientific literature that charts the evolution of scientific publishing, from its early origins to the present status. The key transformations including the shift from a limited self-published legacy to specialized and professional peer-reviewed journals, the impact of technological advancements, and the emergence of new profitable business models are learning points for the future course and couture. Science is pursued and persevered by real humans in social and cultural contexts and not in isolation of laboratories or clinics. Survival of the impartial pure scientific bent of mind and its translation into tangible works has not been easy through the turmoil of various forms of force majeure. The lack of gender parity and even its divergence in some ways was palpable in the discourse of scientific research. Despite that, when provided with a common platform with comparable impact factors and rates of publications, gender inequality seems to vanish and equivalence in academia is discernible. The roles of authors, publishers, and readers have also evolved chronologically, adapting to the influence of cultural and disciplinary factors through the ages. The challenges of predatory publishing, open access, plagiarism, and data capitalization are also growing alongside. Ultimately, understanding the historical context and persistence of the predecessors in the course of scientific publishing can enhance modern scientific research and communication.

Indexed as

digital publishingopen accesspeer reviewrevolutionscholarly communicationscientific publicationscientist

Identifiers

PMID39802709
PMCPMC11717451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.