ArticleClinical kidney journal2025
Drug use and acute kidney injury: a Drug-Wide Association Study (DWAS) in Denmark and Sweden.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Association of Antiemetics Use With Incident Chronic Kidney Disease.Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation · 2025Article
- Signal Mining and Analysis of Drug-Induced Myelosuppression: A Real-World Study From FAERS.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Knowledge of which medications may lead to acute kidney injury (AKI) is limited, relying mostly on spontaneous reporting in pharmacovigilance systems. We here conducted an exploratory drug-wide association study (DWAS) to screen for associations between dispensed drugs and AKI risk. Methods: Using two large Danish and Swedish data linkages, we identified AKI hospitalizations occurring between April 1997 and December 2021 in Denmark and between March 2007 and December 2021 in Sweden. We used a case-time control design comparing drug dispensing in the 3 months prior to the AKI with earlier periods for the same patient. Odds ratios (ORs) for the association between each drug and AKI were estimated using conditional logistic regression and adjusting for the presence of comorbidities. We sought replication of signals in both health systems and explored the plausibility of findings through pharmacovigilance system analysis in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, appearance in the RESCUE list of medications that report AKI as a side effect, PubMed evidence review and causality assessment through direct acyclic graphs. Results: We included 20 622 adults in Denmark and 13 852 in Sweden hospitalized for AKI. In total, 16 unique medications were identified in both cohorts as associated to increased AKI occurrence. Of these, 10 medications had higher reporting ORs in the FAERS database, 9 were listed by RESCUE, and 7 appearing in PubMed. This analysis identified some medications with known AKI risks (i.e. likely true positives such as furosemide, penicillin, spironolactone and omeprazole), medications that may have initiated in response to conditions that lead to AKI (i.e. false positives like metoclopramide provided to treat nausea/vomiting) and other candidates (e.g. opioids) that warrant further evaluation in subsequent studies. Conclusions: This hypothesis-generating study identifies medications with potential involvement in AKI that require confirmation and validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.