Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39802577›Full record

ReviewActa ortopedica brasileira2024

W-SITTING IN CHILDHOOD: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.

David Gonçalves Nordon, Caroline de Gouveia Buff Passone, Clovis Artur Almeida da Silva, Patrícia Moreno Grangeiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta ortopedica brasileira, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David Gonçalves NordonPontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, Departamento de Cirurgia, Disciplina de Ortopedia, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8933-7472
Caroline de Gouveia Buff PassoneUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HC-FMUSP, Departamento de Pediatria, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7981-3335
Clovis Artur Almeida da SilvaUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HC-FMUSP, Departamento de Pediatria, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9250-6508
Patrícia Moreno GrangeiroUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clinicas HC-FMUSP, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Departamento de Ortopedia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1533-659X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite the lack of science-based evidence, many specialists and non-specialists consider W-sitting detrimental to children. This systematic review aims to find evidence on W-sitting.

methodsThis review was registered on PROSPERO under the number CRD42022313341. During January 2023, the term "W-sitting" and its variations were searched on the following databases: PubMed, Medline, Embase, PEDro, and Cochrane. Duplicate articles and those that addressed themes other than W-sitting were removed.

resultsThis review found 3641 articles, removed 614 duplicates, and excluded 3021 for focusing on subjects other than W-sitting. It included seven studies for analysis, one of which was a narrative review and two were methodologically inadequate cross-sectional to evaluate the causal effect in W-sitting. Another article evaluated muscular activation in adults according to sitting position. The last article found no causal relation between W-sitting and developmental dysplasia of the hip.

conclusionThis review found no scientific evidence advise against W-sitting in children and no association with hip dysplasia. Moreover, muscular activation remains the same, regardless of the position chosen for sitting.

Indexed as

Child Development DeviationSitting PositionSystematic ReviewW-sitting

Identifiers

PMID39802577
PMCPMC11723520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.