ArticleJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology2024
Evaluating the User-Perceived Benefit of a Virtual Lung Cancer Patient Education and Support Community: LVNG With Lung Cancer.
Article in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The accessibility and quality of network support for people living with lung cancer (PLW) and their support partners (SP) can vary. Virtual platforms provide unique opportunities for PLW/SP peer support and disease education. Methods: Using a novel dual approach, we determined the user-perceived impact of the AstraZeneca-sponsored Facebook community, Results: 18 PLW and 2 SP were interviewed. Mean years since diagnosis was 2.75 (range, 0.08-17). Of the total expressions of benefit ( Conclusions: This analysis of the real-world impact of a virtual community provided insight into the benefit that members derive. We hypothesize that once members' emotional and educational needs were met, they were empowered and/or inspired to take positive actions leading to better health behaviors and increased quality of life-an outcome that may apply to other diseases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.