Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39802538›Full record

ReviewJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology2024

What Do Patients With Cancer Know, or Want to Know, About Genomic Tumor Sequencing and Genetic Testing? A State-of-the-Art Review.

Lisa Stewart, Linda D Ward

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lisa StewartFrom Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina.
Linda D WardFrom Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular profiling (MP), which involves testing tissue, blood, or other body fluids to identify biomarkers, has become increasingly important in cancer treatment. Genomic tumor sequencing, a specific type of MP, is commonly used to identify specific gene variants or proteins that can be targeted for treatment. Germline testing is also routinely recommended for certain cancers. Low levels of genomic literacy among cancer patients, coupled with increasingly complex test results, challenge clinicians to communicate results and provide appropriate education. In addition, patients may have varying preferences for the level of information they desire and are able to process. This state-of-the-art review explores cancer patients' expectations, attitudes, knowledge, satisfaction, and concerns as they undergo molecular profiling. A search was conducted through four databases to identify studies from 2016 to 2022 to explore cancer patients' knowledge and preferences regarding genomic testing. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies revealed that people with cancer have low levels of knowledge regarding MP, albeit with significant variability. Patients primarily desired MP to identify new treatment options and increase survival. While patients relied on their providers to interpret test results, they wanted to be informed of all results, mainly if those results might guide treatment decisions or future care planning. Most patients, especially those with low genomic/genetic knowledge, tended to overestimate the personal benefits of MP. Further study is needed to provide tailored education to fulfill patients' information needs.

Identifiers

PMID39802538
PMCPMC11715401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.