Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39802529›Full record

ArticleJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology2024

Beyond Standard Endocrine Therapy: A New Adjuvant Treatment in High-Risk Early Breast Cancer.

Barbara Dean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Barbara DeanFrom Carolina Oncology Specialists, Hickory, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The standard adjuvant treatment of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer (EBC) is endocrine therapy (ET). Despite this treatment, 20% of patients will have their disease recur. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors with ET have shown overall survival (OS) benefit in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer in the metastatic setting. Clinical trials are studying the role of oral CDK4/6 inhibitors in the adjuvant treatment of ER-positive, HER2-negative EBC patients who are clinically and pathologically at high risk for recurrence while on standard ET. The monarchE phase III, randomized, controlled trial, looked at one arm of high-risk ER-positive, HER2-negative EBC patients receiving standard ET and the second arm receiving standard ET with a CDK4/6 inhibitor, abemaciclib. Primary endpoint data showed improvement in invasive disease-free survival of 92.2% in the ET and abemaciclib arm vs. 88.7% in the ET arm at 2 years. At 5 years, a preplanned interim analysis showed continued absolute improvement in invasive disease-free survival. Secondary endpoint data for OS have not yet matured. Abemaciclib is approved for use with ET in patients with high-risk, ER-positive, HER2-negative EBC. This article aims to review a case study and the rationale for using oral CDK4/6 inhibitors as adjuvant treatment for this high-risk subset of patients.

Identifiers

PMID39802529
PMCPMC11715397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.