Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39802431›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

Hybrid neural network models for time series disease prediction confronted by spatiotemporal dependencies.

Hamed Bin Furkan, Nabila Ayman, Md Jamal Uddin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hamed Bin FurkanDepartment of Statistics, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, Bangladesh.
Nabila AymanDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Md Jamal UddinDepartment of Statistics, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, Bangladesh.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In infectious disease outbreak modeling, there remains a gap in addressing spatiotemporal challenges present in established models. This study addresses this gap by evaluating four established hybrid neural network models for predicting influenza outbreaks. These models were analyzed by employing time series data from eight different countries to challenge the models with imposed spatial difficulties, in a month-on-month structure. The models' predictions were compared using MAPE, and RMSE, as well as graphical representations generated by employed models. The SARIMA-LSTM model excelled in achieving the lowest average RMSE score of 66.93 as well as reporting the lowest RMSE score for three out of eight countries studied. In this case also, GA-ConvLSTM-CNN model comes in second place with an average RMSE score of 68.46. Considering these results and the ability to follow the seasonal trends of the actual values, this study suggests the SARIMA-LSTM model to be more robust to spatiotemporal challenges compared with the other models under examination. This study•Evaluated established methods with unique imposed difficulty.•Addressed spatiotemporal characteristics of the data.•Proposed the SARIMA-LSTM model based on evaluation metrics.

Indexed as

Disease forecastDisease outbreak predictionHybrid neural networkHybrid Neural NetworksInfluenza outbreaksNeural network comparisonTime series prediction

Identifiers

PMID39802431
PMCPMC11719402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.