ArticleMethodsX2025
Hybrid neural network models for time series disease prediction confronted by spatiotemporal dependencies.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A hybrid STL-LightGBM framework with probabilistic forecasting for Influenza A incidence in the post-pandemic Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In infectious disease outbreak modeling, there remains a gap in addressing spatiotemporal challenges present in established models. This study addresses this gap by evaluating four established hybrid neural network models for predicting influenza outbreaks. These models were analyzed by employing time series data from eight different countries to challenge the models with imposed spatial difficulties, in a month-on-month structure. The models' predictions were compared using MAPE, and RMSE, as well as graphical representations generated by employed models. The SARIMA-LSTM model excelled in achieving the lowest average RMSE score of 66.93 as well as reporting the lowest RMSE score for three out of eight countries studied. In this case also, GA-ConvLSTM-CNN model comes in second place with an average RMSE score of 68.46. Considering these results and the ability to follow the seasonal trends of the actual values, this study suggests the SARIMA-LSTM model to be more robust to spatiotemporal challenges compared with the other models under examination. This study•Evaluated established methods with unique imposed difficulty.•Addressed spatiotemporal characteristics of the data.•Proposed the SARIMA-LSTM model based on evaluation metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.