ArticleJournal of pain research2025
Evaluating Digital Rehabilitation Outcomes in Chronic Musculoskeletal Conditions Across Non-Obesity, Obesity, and Severe Obesity.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the Algorithm: A Critical and Evidence-Based Review of Artificial Intelligence in Chronic Pain Rehabilitation.Cureus · 2026Review
- The Role of Rehabilitation Program in Managing the Triad of Sarcopenia, Obesity, and Chronic Pain.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluating Digital Rehabilitation Outcomes in Chronic Musculoskeletal Conditions Across Non-Obesity, Obesity, and Severe Obesity [Letter].Journal of pain research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Obesity is a known risk factor and aggravator of musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. The rising prevalence of obesity calls for scalable solutions to address MSK conditions in this population, given their complex clinical profile and barriers to accessing care. Purpose: To evaluate the engagement and clinical outcomes of a fully remote digital care program in patients with MSK conditions, focusing on those with and without comorbid obesity. Patients and Methods: A post-hoc analysis of a prospective, longitudinal, single-arm observational home-based study conducted between August, 2023, and August, 2024. Adults suffering from chronic MSK pain were categorized according to their body mass index (BMI) into non-obesity, obesity and severe obesity. Outcomes included completion rates, engagement, satisfaction, pain (minimal clinically important change: 30%), impairment in daily activities, and patient global impression of change (PGIC). Depending on the clinical outcomes, latent basis growth analysis and logistic regression were used. Results: Completion rates were high across all groups (77.5-85.6%), although slightly lower in the obesity groups. Fairly similar engagement was observed with both exercise sessions and the educational content (1.9-2.2 exercise sessions per week; 8.10-9.31 educational content videos watched). Obesity groups interacted more with the physical therapists than the non-obesity group (severe obesity: 24.6 (SD 10.1); obesity: 23.2 (SD 10.46) vs non-obesity: 22.4 (SD 9.8), P < 0.001). Despite higher baseline risk and clinical impairment in the obesity groups, all groups showed significant pain reductions, with pain responder rates ranging from 56.6 to 63.6%, slightly lower in the severe obesity group. Improvements in daily activities were significant across groups, alongside a positive PGIC (50.4-53.6%). Satisfaction was very high (>9/10) in all BMI groups. Conclusion: Despite worse baseline clinical presentations, obesity groups achieved high completion rates, engagement, and significant clinical improvements comparable to the non-obesity group, highlighting the potential of a digital program for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.