ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2025
Weakly supervised pathological differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphoma and glioblastoma on multi-site whole slide images.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Differentiating primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and glioblastoma (GBM) is crucial because their prognosis and treatment differ substantially. Manual examination of their histological characteristics is considered the golden standard in clinical diagnosis. However, this process is tedious and time-consuming and might lead to misdiagnosis caused by morphological similarity between their histology and tumor heterogeneity. Existing research focuses on radiological differentiation, which mostly uses multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging. By contrast, we investigate the pathological differentiation between the two types of tumors using whole slide images (WSIs) of postoperative formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. Approach: To learn the specific and intrinsic histological feature representations from the WSI patches, a self-supervised feature extractor is trained. Then, the patch representations are fused by feeding into a weakly supervised multiple-instance learning model for the WSI classification. We validate our approach on 134 PCNSL and 526 GBM cases collected from three hospitals. We also investigate the effect of feature extraction on the final prediction by comparing the performance of applying the feature extractors trained on the PCNSL/GBM slides from specific institutions, multi-site PCNSL/GBM slides, and large-scale histopathological images. Results: Different feature extractors perform comparably with the overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value exceeding 85% for each dataset and close to 95% for the combined multi-site dataset. Using the institution-specific feature extractors generally obtains the best overall prediction with both of the PCNSL and GBM classification accuracies reaching 80% for each dataset. Conclusions: The excellent classification performance suggests that our approach can be used as an assistant tool to reduce the pathologists' workload by providing an accurate and objective second diagnosis. Moreover, the discriminant regions indicated by the generated attention heatmap improve the model interpretability and provide additional diagnostic information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.