Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39802313›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2025

Clinical significance of cachexia index determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Tomoya Ohara, Naoto Iwai, Kohei Oka, Kengo Okabe, Hiroaki Sakai, Toshifumi Tsuji, Takashi Okuda, Junichi Sakagami, Keizo Kagawa, Toshifumi Doi and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Tomoya OharaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, Kyoto, Kansai 620-0056, Japan.
Naoto IwaiDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kansai 602-8566, Japan.
Kohei OkaDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kansai 602-8566, Japan.
Kengo OkabeDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kansai 602-8566, Japan.
Hiroaki SakaiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, Kyoto, Kansai 620-0056, Japan.
Toshifumi TsujiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, Kyoto, Kansai 620-0056, Japan.
Takashi OkudaDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kansai 602-8566, Japan.
Junichi SakagamiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, Kyoto, Kansai 620-0056, Japan.
Keizo KagawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, Kyoto, Kansai 620-0056, Japan.
Toshifumi DoiDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kansai 602-8566, Japan.
Ken InoueDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kansai 602-8566, Japan.
Osamu DohiDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kansai 602-8566, Japan.
Naohisa YoshidaDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kansai 602-8566, Japan.
Kanji YamaguchiDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kansai 602-8566, Japan.
Michihisa MoriguchiDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kansai 602-8566, Japan.
Kazuhiko UchiyamaDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kansai 602-8566, Japan.
Takeshi IshikawaDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kansai 602-8566, Japan.
Tomohisa TakagiDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kansai 602-8566, Japan.
Hideyuki KonishiDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kansai 602-8566, Japan.
Yoshito ItohDepartment of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kansai 602-8566, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer cachexia is a complex disorder characterized by skeletal muscle loss, which may influence the prognosis of patients with cancer. The cachexia index (CXI) is a new index for cachexia. The present study aimed to assess whether the CXI determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is valuable for predicting survival in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. A total of 54 patients with gastrointestinal cancer undergoing BIA at the time of diagnosis at Fukuchiyama City Hospital (Kyoto, Japan) were retrospectively recruited. CXI values were calculated as follows: CXI=skeletal muscle index (SMI) × serum albumin concentration/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. The SMI was measured using BIA values. The patients were classified into low- and high-CXI groups. The median patient age was 72 years and 63.0% of patients were male. A total of 20 patients with colorectal cancer were enrolled, 12 with pancreatic cancer, 11 with gastric cancer, 6 with esophageal cancer, 4 with biliary tract cancer and 1 with liver cancer. The cumulative one-year overall survival (OS) rate was significantly worse in the low-CXI group compared with that in the high-CXI group (58.3 vs. 88.5%; P=0.012). By contrast, the SMI had no significant effect on OS. Thus, CXI values using BIA may predict survival in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Indexed as

bioelectrical impedance analysiscachexia indexcancer cachexiagastrointestinal cancerprognosis

Identifiers

PMID39802313
PMCPMC11718620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.