Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39802308›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Effects of non-pharmacological interventions on depressive and anxiety symptoms in pregnant women: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Guowei Zeng, Jianfeng Niu, Ke Zhu, Fei Li, Liwen Li, Kaiming Gao, Yanlong Zhuang, Boyang Zhang, Xiaoqiang Han, Gang Ye and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Guowei ZengCollege of Competitive Sports, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Jianfeng NiuCollege of Competitive Sports, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Ke ZhuCollege of Competitive Sports, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Fei LiSchool of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Liwen LiSchool of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Kaiming GaoDepartment of Hand Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Yanlong ZhuangCollege of Competitive Sports, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Boyang ZhangCollege of Competitive Sports, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Xiaoqiang HanDepartment of Orthopedics, The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030000, China.
Gang YeDepartment of Orthopaedics, The People's Hospital of Huangpi District, Wuhan, China.
Zhikun GaoCollege of Competitive Sports, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Haobai LiCollege of Competitive Sports, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Given the distinctive physiological characteristics of pregnant women, non-pharmacological therapies are increasingly being used to improve depressive and anxiety symptoms. Our objective was to explore and compare the impact of various non-pharmacological interventions in improving depressive and anxiety symptoms, and to identify the most effective strategies for pregnant women with depressive and/or anxiety symptoms. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared non-pharmacological interventions to usual care, from the inception of each database up to October 5, 2024. We included pregnant women with singleton pregnancies who, at baseline, exhibited early signs of depressive and/or anxiety symptoms but did not meet clinical diagnostic criteria or exceed the threshold for clinically significant symptoms. We excluded pregnant women diagnosed with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or severe acute psychiatric conditions, those with a history of substance abuse, and those undergoing in vitro fertilisation. We performed both pairwise meta-analyses and random-effects network meta-analyses (NMAs), calculating standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). We used the surface under the cumulative ranking probability curve (SUCRA) to estimate treatment ranking probabilities. The outcomes were assessed in two groups of participants: a high-risk pregnancy group, including pregnant women with depressive and/or anxiety symptoms and high-risk pregnancies (defined as having a history of miscarriage, pregnancy complications such as gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, or preeclampsia, and advanced maternal age (i.e., over 35 years old); and a healthy group, including participants who exhibited depressive and/or anxiety symptoms only during pregnancy and did not have other high-risk pregnancy conditions or underlying health issues. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024523053. Findings: We included 101 studies (92 RCTs and 9 quasi-RCTs) involving a total of 15,330 participants across 11 interventions (mindfulness, education, counseling, cognitive behavioral therapy, muscle acupoint therapy, relaxation, mind-body exercise, psychotherapy, foetal movement counting, physical exercise, and music). Among the studies included in this analysis, 73 studies exhibited a low risk of bias, 9 studies had an unclear risk of bias, and 19 studies demonstrated a high risk of bias. The results indicate that, for both high-risk pregnancy population and healthy populations, mindfulness therapy was found to be an effective non-pharmacological treatment for significantly improving depressive and anxiety symptoms in pregnant women compared with control groups. For pregnant women with depressive symptoms, mindfulness therapy (SUCRA = 80%; SMD = -0.86, 95% CrI = -1.2, -0.52; Nn = 598), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) (SUCRA = 65%; SMD = -0.69, 95% CrI = -1.0, -0.39; Nn = 712), and education therapy (SUCRA = 48%; SMD = -0.54, 95% CrI = -0.86, -0.23; Nn = 2285) all significantly improve depressive symptoms. In the subgroup analysis of healthy populations, muscle acupoint therapy (SUCRA = 77.17%; SMD = -0.89, 95% CrI = -1.55, -0.23; N = 99) and mind-body exercise (SUCRA = 47.54%; SMD = -0.53, 95% CrI = -0.88, -0.19; N = 352) also significantly reduce depressive symptoms. Subgroup analysis shows that, in addition to mindfulness therapy, mind-body exercises (SUCRA = 67.43%; SMD = -0.97, 95% CrI = -1.61, -0.33; N = 382) and cognitive-behavioral therapy (SUCRA = 52.60%; SMD = -0.74, 95% CrI = -1.38, -0.09; N = 480) may also be effective in alleviating anxiety symptoms among healthy pregnant women. Interpretation: Our findings indicate that mindfulness therapy significantly reduces the risk of depressive and anxiety symptoms in both high-risk pregnancy population and healthy populations. Therefore, when selecting non-pharmacologic therapies for managing depressive and anxiety symptoms during pregnancy, it is recommended that this therapy be considered. We cannot overlook the limitations of this study. For example, some interventions, such as muscle acupoint therapy for depressive symptoms and relaxation therapy for anxiety symptoms, have limited literature support. Additionally, the diversity of conditions within the high-risk pregnancy population and the high heterogeneity observed in certain interventions are also issues that require attention. These factors may affect the accuracy of the data results. Although we have employed reliable methods to address these issues, the findings of this study should still be interpreted with caution. Funding: None.

Indexed as

Anxiety symptomsDepressive symptomsNetwork meta-analysisNon-pharmacological interventionPregnant woman

Identifiers

PMID39802308
PMCPMC11718295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.