Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39802277›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

A Reproducible Method for Donor Site Computed Tomography Measurements in Abdominally Based Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

Damini Tandon, Arthur Sletten, Austin Ha, Gary B Skolnick, Paul Commean, Terence Myckatyn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Damini TandonFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Arthur SlettenFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Austin HaDepartment of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Gary B SkolnickFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Paul CommeanMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO.
Terence MyckatynFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present an approach for evaluating abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans that generates reproducible measures relevant to donor site morbidity after abdominally based breast reconstruction. Seventeen preoperative CT metrics were measured in 20 patients with software: interanterior superior iliac spine distance; abdominal wall protrusion; interrectus distance; rectus abdominis width, thickness, and width-to-thickness ratio; abdominal wall thickness; subcutaneous fat volume; visceral fat volume; right/left psoas volumes and densities; and right/left rectus abdominis volumes and densities. Two operators performed measures to determine interrater reliability (n = 10). Interclass coefficients (ICCs) were calculated, and Bland-Altman plots were fashioned. Intrarater reliability was excellent (ICC > 0.9, 0.958-1) for 15 measures, and good (0.75 < ICC < 0.9, 0.815-0.853) for 2 measures. Interrater reliability was excellent (ICC > 0.9, 0.912-0.995) for 12 measures and good (0.75 < ICC < 0.9, 0.78-0.896) for 5 measures. Bland-Altman plots confirmed intra/interrater agreement. Our study meets its objective of establishing a protocol for obtaining abdominal CT measurements with high reproducibility and intrarater and interrater reliability. Although this study is not meant to weigh the particular influences of various CT measurements on clinical outcomes, we are now actively studying this with the intention of reporting our findings in the near future. Larger patient cohorts must be leveraged to determine correlations between abdominal CT scan findings and donor site outcomes using machine learning algorithms that generate models for predicting abdominal donor site complications.

Identifiers

PMID39802277
PMCPMC11723691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.