Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39802274›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Innovations in Nipple-areolar Complex Reconstruction: Evaluation of a New Prosthesis.

Michele Riccio, Angelica Aquinati, Mario Fordellone, Nicola Carboni, Andrea Marchesini, Francesco De Francesco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michele RiccioFrom the Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Angelica AquinatiFrom the Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Mario FordelloneDepartment of Mental, Phisical Health and Preventive Medicine Campania University L. Vanvitelli, Napoli, Italy.
Nicola CarboniDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Andrea MarchesiniFrom the Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Francesco De FrancescoFrom the Department of Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex (NAC) is a crucial step for completing breast restoration with patient satisfaction. Surgical reconstruction or tattooing of the NAC may not be preferable or feasible for some patients. There is no universal method for NAC that is ideal for every patient or clinical situation. Various approaches often do not maintain projection over time. Over time, several techniques have been perfected, including the C-V flap, to improve and support projection for patients with bilateral implant-based reconstructions. Methods: We used, for the first time, prosthetic devices for NAC reconstruction and examined the safety of these devices associated with ease of implantation and patient satisfaction levels using a survey conducted during a 1-year follow-up. We enrolled 20 individuals who opted for these NAC prostheses following unilateral or bilateral breast reconstruction and following NAC excision. Results: Ninety percent of the participants expressed satisfaction or high satisfaction with the appearance and balance of the new NAC. The prosthetics enhanced the overall body self-image and self-regard of all the study participants. Except for 4 patients, there were no reports of skin adverse reactions, infections, or erosion. Conclusions: Encouraged by these auspicious outcomes that indicate a significant rate of safety and satisfaction, we believe that this straightforward, noninvasive, affordable medical device deserves consideration as a reconstructive option for all patients seeking breast reconstruction, promoting full body integrity.

Identifiers

PMID39802274
PMCPMC11723670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.