Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39802271›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Reshaping Our Understanding of Sensation and Pain Following Breast Reduction Surgery.

Katya Remy, Curtis L Cetrulo, Colby J Hyland, Riley Baker, Anna Reaman, Krishna Vyas, Lisa Gfrerer, William G Austen, Katherine H Carruthers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katya RemyFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Curtis L CetruloDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Colby J HylandFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Riley BakerFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Anna ReamanFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Krishna VyasFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Lisa GfrererDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
William G AustenFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Katherine H CarruthersFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated the sensory and breast pain outcomes in inferior versus superomedial pedicle breast reduction. Methods: Twenty patients undergoing the inferior pedicle technique were matched to 20 patients undergoing the superomedial pedicle technique based on age, BMI, and resection weight. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Monofilament testing was performed on the nipple-areola complex (NAC) and surrounding breast. Patient-reported outcomes included nipple and breast sensation (5-point Likert scale), pain intensity (0-10), and the Patient-reported Outcome Measurement Information System Neuropathic Pain Quality scale. Results: At the NAC, mean monofilament values and patient-reported sensation were significantly better in the inferior versus the superomedial pedicle group at 1 and 3 months postoperatively ( Conclusions: The inferior pedicle may allow for earlier restoration of quantitative and patient-reported NAC sensation, but long-term sensation is comparable between techniques. A quarter of patients reported persistent breast pain regardless of the pedicle type.

Identifiers

PMID39802271
PMCPMC11723695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.